After a misstep on the fourth
day I managed to post one post every day, completing the rest of the
streak! This post is scheduled
to go out around the time my plane takes off.
I’m free!
I’d insert a Frozen gif here if I could find a good one,
but I don’t like any of the ones I found and besides, copyright is an
issue. So instead:
IMO2007.C6. In a mathematical competition some competitors are
friends. Friendship is always mutual. Call a group of competitors a
clique if each two of them are friends. (In particular, any group of
fewer than two competitiors is a clique.) The number of members of a
clique is called its size.
Given that, in this competition, the largest size of a clique is
even, prove that the competitors can be arranged into two rooms such
that the largest size of a clique contained in one room is the same as
the largest size of a clique contained in the other room.
Author: Vasily Astakhov, Russia
If you remember where I first posted this to break a combo, you have
an excellent memory and/or spend too much time stalking me. If you
remember the context under which I posted this to break a
combo, you have a better memory than I do.
Was my streak a success? On the bright side, I definitely generated
lots of posts, many of which were radical departures from my old
blogging habits:
Blogging is weird. I’m still nervous when I post stuff because I’m
concerned I’m wrong, and end up looking unprofessional or attracting a
bunch of Cueballs or something.
Before I told people about this blog, during the time when 100% of
its traffic came from its coincidental placement in search results, I
didn’t have to worry about this. Now, I choose my words. Because some
Important Person™ might show up. Maybe even misinterpret something I
said and/or get furiously offended at a badly phrased joke.
I also fear that I’ll update my beliefs quickly; maybe I’ll change my
mind or discover a much better argument for the other side really soon.
But the blog post would still be there, displaying my old belief, giving
the reader an inaccurate or misleading impression of myself. People
might even chat with me to argue about it, and then I have to admit
I’m wrong oh no! It feels a lot better admitting I’m wrong on my
own turf, in my own time.
This passage from Lord of the Flies comes to mind (I had
hurriedly reread the book as ammunition for the AP Literature test and
noticed that my past self had marked it):
For the interested, I wrote a
post
summarizing issues in copyright and patent law on a new
blog for a school club. Actually, if you’re reading this post, you’re
probably already interested enough / bored enough to read that post, so
go read it. I think the videos are worth watching despite their length,
but I tried to summarize the key points in text, so decide how much to
read or watch depending on how much spare time you have.
I don’t know if that blog will work out, but anyway WordPress tells
me I have 8500% more followers on this blog than the other one, even
though I have doubts about how many of those followers actually read
anything I post at all, so I thought I should link to that post here.
Also, by publicizing the blog, I get to shame my friends and fellow club
members into posting so that it doesn’t look so empty. Social media
expertise, you know?
Note: My 2012 self wrote this. It is a little dated
and does not entirely capture my current beliefs and attitudes, although
I have to say it’s not too far off either. As of 2018, Me and Facebook is more
relevant.
Here’s a guilty secret: I like getting feedback.
I’m not restricting myself to painstakingly thoughtful comments that
attempt to build upon and transform the post to form
an interesting conversation, the kind English teachers are hellbent on
promoting. Sure, I get the most kicks out of those, but I’m not picky.
Even single-digit pageview bars or a handful of Facebook “like”s give me
buzzes of excitement.
It’s a guilty feeling, because I also think that that these are
unimaginably cheap internet currencies and should not qualify as
“meaningful” under a rational mindset. I strongly suspect visitors
accidentally click on my blog and leave after five seconds without
taking in anything, because I do that all the time to other people’s
blogs and sites. Sometimes it is out of boredom, sometimes it is because
I actually have something of higher priority to do than indiscriminate
reading, sometimes it is simply because I cannot read the language. I’ve
seen plenty of people like posts on Facebook based on the poster, only
occasionally taking into consideration the first word of the post in
question, before actually reading them.
Yes, the proliferation of “liking” on Facebook bothers me. I don’t
expect everybody to reply meaningfully to everything when they just want
to express approval lightly. However, when I see that tiny minority of
people handing them out to people in their own threads like programs at
a concert, I become indignant. Under their influence, what was
originally a straightforward, meaningful badge of appreciation becomes a
handwavy gesture that carries virtually no weight, and then I don’t know
what to do when I see something I like seriously. Will clicking
that button still express the feeling strongly enough?
I accept that, in our stressful world, a few instant effortless gags
that take ten seconds to fully process and approve deserve a place.
Nevertheless, the number of people who seem to want to make the “like” a
completely passive and automatic action is almost physically
painful:
Some bloggers have a regular schedule for posting and forcing
themselves to meet the deadlines. In essence, something like “updates
every Thursday.”
For me, I think this is a bad idea, because it forces me to write. If
my day is boring and uneventful as it quite often is and I still have to
crank out a post, it would not be a post that readers would enjoy.
Better once-a-month enthusiastic, interesting posts then an ugly stream
of tedious drudgery for the visitor to wade through every time, stuff
like (quoting one random ancient post):
