Some bloggers have a regular schedule for posting and forcing
themselves to meet the deadlines. In essence, something like “updates
every Thursday.”
For me, I think this is a bad idea, because it forces me to write. If
my day is boring and uneventful as it quite often is and I still have to
crank out a post, it would not be a post that readers would enjoy.
Better once-a-month enthusiastic, interesting posts then an ugly stream
of tedious drudgery for the visitor to wade through every time, stuff
like (quoting one random ancient post):
Finally getting into geography honors. And surviving, somehow, with
grades that still might count as ridiculous-in-a-good-way. The one big
change I’m getting used to is the need to take actual hardcore
notes.
For eight years, most classes I’ve gone to, both inside or outside
school, have been straight from a book or handout, which would be so
easily read and comprehended (…to me) that any notes would be a waste of
energy. A couple science teachers would make us take notes and count
them as a grade. All you had to do to get an A was write down most of
the important bits, even if the chapter sections were written in
exaggerated cursive that took up half the page and there were random
teddy bears straddling the margins, as in my notes.
There was a stage in maybe seventh grade where I told myself I would
make neat, doodle-free notes that actually summarized the stuff in
biology (the easy seventh-grade kind (not that we still remember all of
it)), and to get to that goal I would force myself to use only one page
for each section, with a special way to mark the vocabulary words. It
helped studying a little, but the stage didn’t last, and I ended up
doodling again.
Even when the going finally got tough and understanding became a
nontrivial task, I still had irrelevant embellishments and a bunch of
artificial fonts for my “notes”. Even in the days when I was free to go
to the Chiao-Tung University for classes twice a week (and still get
consistently ridiculous grades, judging by the score breakdowns the prof
gave us after every test), my notes looked like this.
Exhibit A: mathematical analysis/advanced calculus notes, circa 2010
If you are reading this, then our APMO testing time is over! There’s
a small chance of me being really happy or really frustrated about how I
did, but I’m betting on a solid “meh.”
Rules
page by mathgrant. There’s no way I’m going to memorize the Japanese
name yet. [edit: It’s Sashigane. It’s not that hard.]
A ratio-preserving enlargement of the janko.at sample invocation
puzzle, perhaps. I wanted to try using smaller clues. Finally a grid too
large for full-size displaying! Is that even supposed to be an
achievement?