Note: My 2012 self wrote this. It is preserved for
historical interest and amusement.
Hahahahahahahahahahahahaha look at all the services
ahem
So, if you’ve been hiding under a rock for the last decade, Twitter
is a platform for microblogging, i.e. blogging with very short posts,
called tweets, which have to be under 140 characters after they shorten
all the links for you for no reason, often after you’ve already
shortened it once somehow-or-other. And yes, I hopped onto the bandwagon
during procrastination. Everybody who matters on the technological edges
of the internet seems to have one.
I’m not arrogant enough to imagine I could compare Twitter to
anything else authoritatively… I only barely count myself as using it.
But a brief set of first impressions should be okay. Twitter is very
public: you can see everybody’s tweets, who everybody is following, and
who everybody is being followed by; the single privacy setting is a
simple binary choice to lock up your account, so that everybody who
wants to see what you posted needs your explicit authorization.
My Facebook feed consists of entries such as:
photographs of people I barely recognize, which I scroll past
quickly… unless my mom comes up and says “Who is that?” and spends ten
minutes looking at more such photos while asking me questions like “How
do you go to the next picture?” or “Why is this photo so blurry?”
context-less fragments of some larger conversation, e.g. “LOL!” or
“linglinglinggg” (copied verbatim from a status)
alerts of J. Random Person having taken a Personality Test or scored
too many lines in Tetris
Meta-Facebook infographics, like a cloud of your closest friends or
number of status posts. I tend to… have an extraordinarily negative
impression of the type of narcissistic achievement-reliant…
people… who need rewards at every step, except that they seem
to be everybody… *sigh
Yes, it’s official now. I’m on the 2012 International Mathematical
Olympiad team bound for Argentina, and if I didn’t make a post about
this I would be ashamed to call myself a blogger. So, a little moment of
smug self-satisfaction should be justified, I hope? And not to mention,
last year’s title of youngest Taiwan contestant is not yet passed? Let’s
cue the evil laughter!
…or maybe not.
Here is a simple tabulation of our selection problems:
GA/GN/CG/GNC/NGA
AG/CA/NG/GCN/AGA
GA/GN/CA/GCN/AGC
Algebra x9, Combinatorics x7, Geometry x12, Number Theory x8. In
other words a distribution in perfect negative correlation with my
estimated ability in each subject. At least, that’s how I’ve always
estimated them before about a month ago. Ouch, the last stage was the
only one of the three where problem distribution for combinatorics
actually reached its fair share. (Alternative interpretation: 2011’s
distribution was majorly f123ed up with only one real geometry problem,
which just means that this year’s battle will probably be difficult for
me. (Alternative alternative interpretation: the evil, nasty, wicked,
depraved windmill was actually an outrageous negative for me. Gee, I
don’t know how to feel. But I should actually do stuff instead of wildly
speculating; let’s get back to the topic.))
Some bloggers have a regular schedule for posting and forcing
themselves to meet the deadlines. In essence, something like “updates
every Thursday.”
For me, I think this is a bad idea, because it forces me to write. If
my day is boring and uneventful as it quite often is and I still have to
crank out a post, it would not be a post that readers would enjoy.
Better once-a-month enthusiastic, interesting posts then an ugly stream
of tedious drudgery for the visitor to wade through every time, stuff
like (quoting one random ancient post):
Finally getting into geography honors. And surviving, somehow, with
grades that still might count as ridiculous-in-a-good-way. The one big
change I’m getting used to is the need to take actual hardcore
notes.
For eight years, most classes I’ve gone to, both inside or outside
school, have been straight from a book or handout, which would be so
easily read and comprehended (…to me) that any notes would be a waste of
energy. A couple science teachers would make us take notes and count
them as a grade. All you had to do to get an A was write down most of
the important bits, even if the chapter sections were written in
exaggerated cursive that took up half the page and there were random
teddy bears straddling the margins, as in my notes.
There was a stage in maybe seventh grade where I told myself I would
make neat, doodle-free notes that actually summarized the stuff in
biology (the easy seventh-grade kind (not that we still remember all of
it)), and to get to that goal I would force myself to use only one page
for each section, with a special way to mark the vocabulary words. It
helped studying a little, but the stage didn’t last, and I ended up
doodling again.
Even when the going finally got tough and understanding became a
nontrivial task, I still had irrelevant embellishments and a bunch of
artificial fonts for my “notes”. Even in the days when I was free to go
to the Chiao-Tung University for classes twice a week (and still get
consistently ridiculous grades, judging by the score breakdowns the prof
gave us after every test), my notes looked like this.
Exhibit A: mathematical analysis/advanced calculus notes, circa 2010
If you are reading this, then our APMO testing time is over! There’s
a small chance of me being really happy or really frustrated about how I
did, but I’m betting on a solid “meh.”
Rules
page by mathgrant. There’s no way I’m going to memorize the Japanese
name yet. [edit: It’s Sashigane. It’s not that hard.]
A ratio-preserving enlargement of the janko.at sample invocation
puzzle, perhaps. I wanted to try using smaller clues. Finally a grid too
large for full-size displaying! Is that even supposed to be an
achievement?